Reproductive medicine news. Digest of publications, issue 9
https://doi.org/10.14341/brh12783
Abstract
This issue of reproductive medicine news presents current research and data from reviews and meta-analyses on the study and innovative methods of treating diseases of the reproductive system, presented in leading international periodicals
About the Author
I. I. Barmina
Endocrinology Research Centre
Россия
Россия
Irina I. Barmina, PhD in Medical sciences
11 Dm.Ulyanova street, 117036 Moscow
References
1. Esteves SC. Refining assisted reproductive technology strategy in nonobstructive azoospermia: synchrony, sperm quality, and oocyte availability. Fertil Steril. 2025 Sep;124(3):445-447. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2025.05.171. Epub 2025 May 31. PMID: 40456435.
2. Gingold JA, Wu H, Lieman H, Singh M, Jindal S. Increasing endometrial thickness up to 12 mm is associated with increased odds of live birth among fresh and frozen-thawed autologous transfers with or without preimplantation genetic testing. Fertil Steril. 2025 Sep;124(3):478-486. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2025.04.032. Epub 2025 Apr 28. PMID: 40306566.
3. Mahutte N, Hartman M, Meng L, Lanes A, Luo ZC, Liu KE. Optimal endometrial thickness in fresh and frozen-thaw in vitro fertilization cycles: an analysis of live birth rates from 96,000 autologous embryo transfers. Fertil Steril. 2022 Apr;117(4):792-800. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.12.025. Epub 2022 Jan 31. PMID: 35109980.
4. Alonso-Mayo C, Kohls G, Santos-Ribeiro S, Soares SR, Garcia-Velasco JA. Modified natural cycle allows a window of 7 days for frozen embryo transfer planning. Reprod Biomed Online. 2024 Jul;49(1):103774. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2023.103774. Epub 2023 Dec 17. PMID: 38609793.
5. Altmäe S, Rodríguez-Santisteban A. Emerging targets for advancing endometrial therapeutics. Reprod Biomed Online. 2025 Apr;50(4):104785. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2024.104785. PMID: 40287196.
6. Schoyer KD, Rydze RT, Gunderson SJ. Endometrial thickness: should we have a new threshold? Fertil Steril. 2025 Sep;124(3):448-449. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2025.05.169. Epub 2025 May 31. PMID: 40456434.
7. Priskorn L, Lindahl-Jacobsen R, Jensen TK, Holmboe SA, Hansen LS, Kriegbaum M, Lind BS, Siersma V, Andersen CL, Jørgensen N. Semen quality and lifespan: a study of 78 284 men followed for up to 50 years. Hum Reprod. 2025 Apr 1;40(4):730-738. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deaf023. PMID: 40037905.
8. Better semen quality is linked to men living longer Written by Laura Rossignoli. Mar, 2025/ https://www.focusonreproduction.eu/press-releases/better-semen-quality-is-linked-to-men-living-longer/
9. World Health Organisation Guideline Development Group for Infertility; Mburu G, Santesso N, Brignardello-Petersen R, Kennedy R, Farquhar C, Boivin J, Pennings G, Giudice LC, Rebar RW, Gianaroli L, Vuong LN, Esteves SC, De Jonge CJ, Pacey A, Ombelet W, Kucuk T, Collura BL, Kordic K, Amato P, Matsaseng T, Kiarie J. Recommendations from the WHO guideline for the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of infertility†. Hum Reprod. 2025 Nov 28:deaf212. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deaf212. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 41312724.
Supplementary files
Review
For citations:
Barmina I.I. Reproductive medicine news. Digest of publications, issue 9. Bulletin of Reproductive Health. 2025;4(4):5-9. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.14341/brh12783
Views:
66
JATS XML
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).
Email this article 
